Prediction of Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Conor Niland Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Gimeno-Traver vs C. Niland

Daniel Gimeno-Traver

ESP

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

129

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$56.5K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Conor Niland

IRL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

129

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$1.1M

Career Money

$56.5K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Gimeno-Traver 1 - 0 Niland

They have played 3 sets in total, with Daniel Gimeno-Traver winning 2 and Conor Niland winning 1. The last match between Daniel Gimeno-Traver and Conor Niland was at the San Sebastian Challenger, 15-08-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Daniel Gimeno-Traver getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gimeno-Traver	1
Niland	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) San Sebastian Challenger(08-15-11)

Stats

Daniel Gimeno-Traver

Conor Niland

D. Gimeno-Traver vs C. Niland H2H Profile

D. Gimeno-Traver	Stats	C. Niland
$1,102,200	Career Prize Money	$56,485
56.61% (625-479)	Career Total W/L	56.42% (268-207)
1	Clay	0
24	Titles	10
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

D. Gimeno-Traver vs C. Niland Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Conor Niland has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel Gimeno-Traver, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Conor Niland has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Daniel Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Conor Niland has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Conor Niland winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Daniel Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/22). Conor Niland has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 87/61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 11/12).
Player level: In the last year, Daniel Gimeno-Traver has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Conor Niland has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Daniel Gimeno-Traver winning 1 times and Conor Niland being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Daniel Gimeno-Traver winning 2 and Conor Niland winning 1.
The last match between Daniel Gimeno-Traver and Conor Niland was at the San Sebastian Challenger, 15-08-2011, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Daniel Gimeno-Traver getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:19.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel Gimeno-Traver has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Conor Niland has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Conor Niland has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Conor Niland has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Conor Niland Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Gimeno-Traver vs C. Niland H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Gimeno-Traver	Stats	C. Niland
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
16	Games Won	14
2	Aces (Total)	2
4	Total Double Faults	8
2:6:19	Average Match Time	2:6:19
54% (44/82)	1st Serve %	63% (66/104)
80% (35/44)	1st Serve Win %	61% (40/66)
47% (18/38)	2nd Serve Win %	45% (17/38)
33% (5/15)	Break Pts Won %	50% (4/8)
45% (47/104)	Return Points Win %	35% (29/82)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Barcelona Challenger - 04-10-2021
Q1 Oleksii KrutykhO. Krutykh	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
Oeiras 3 Challenger - 17-05-2021
Q1 Ernests GulbisE. Gulbis	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Barcelona Challenger - 30-09-2019
R1 Javier Barranco CosanoJ. Barranco	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Florence Challenger - 23-09-2019
R1 Mario Vilella MartinezM. Vilella	L	7-6(1) 6-2	Stats
Biella Challenger - 16-09-2019
R1 Viktor GalovicV. Galovic	L	6-3 7-5	Stats

View All

C. Niland Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Davis Cup, Group II, PO, EGY-IRL 2-3 - 02-04-2012
Rubber 2 Sherif SabryS. Sabry	L	2-6 6-1 6-0 6-2	Stats
Kyoto Challenger - 05-03-2012
R1 Yuki BhambriY. Bhambri	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Singapore Challenger - 27-02-2012
R1 Go SoedaG. Soeda	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Davis Cup, Group II, 1R, HUN-IRL 3-2 - 06-02-2012
Rubber 4 Attila BalazsA. Balazs	L	6-1 6-2 6-1	Stats
Rubber 2 Marton FucsovicsM. Fucsovics	L	7-6(4) 6-4 6-7(3) 2-6 6-2	Stats

View All

D. Gimeno-Traver vs C. Niland Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Gimeno-Traver	Stats	C. Niland
56.61% (625/479)	YTD Win/Loss	56.42% (268/207)
54.44% (1415/1184)	Sets Win/Loss	55.17% (614/499)
51.91% (12975/12022)	Games Win/Loss	52.57% (5408/4879)
34.12% (29/56)	Hard Win/Loss	56.94% (82/62)
61.03% (578/369)	Clay Win/Loss	58.78% (87/61)
27.27% (12/32)	Indoor Hard W/L	55.00% (88/72)
21.43% (6/22)	Grass Win/Loss	47.83% (11/12)
0.22	Aces Per Game	0.06
2684	Aces Total	281
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.07
2209	Total Double Faults	345
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
600.56	Average Opponent Rank	541.76
59% (29576/49868)	1st Serve %	63% (3946/6271)
70% (20559/29576)	1st Serve Win %	67% (2643/3946)
50% (10099/20308)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (1093/2325)
42% (2075/4983)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (266/650)
39% (19916/50722)	Return Points Win %	40% (2460/6162)
29.82% (17/40)	Slam W/L	44.00% (11/14)
46.27% (31/36)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
33.33% (2/4)	Cups W/L	47.62% (10/11)
46.82% (140/159)	Main Tour W/L	44.44% (12/15)
61.03% (343/219)	Challenger W/L	50.75% (101/98)
81.42% (92/21)	Futures W/L	66.01% (134/69)
58% (605/1050)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (255/445)
28% (11/40)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	48% (10/21)
47% (175/372)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	44% (49/111)
55% (196/355)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (79/145)
87% (597/521)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (256/216)
12% (597/73)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (256/40)
20% (505/100)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	24% (219/53)